Product Management

Waterfall Project Management Methodology - Ultimate Guide

Learn everything you need to know about waterfall methodology: what it is, how it works, its pros and cons, the waterfall methodology stages, and an example of a waterfall product management approach in action.

Ayush Jangra
Ayush Jangra
The waterfall methodology is as old as the dinosaurs. In a waterfall, one idea flows into another (like water in a waterfall).

Waterfall methodology is a type of project management that has been around since the 1960s.

It's been around so long that you might be wondering: is waterfall methodology still relevant?

The answer is yes!

The waterfall methodology isn't going anywhere and it shouldn't.

Waterfall methodology is a project management approach that has been around since the 1960s, and it’s still used today. It’s one of the most popular approaches to project management because it reduces complexity by breaking down large projects into smaller phases and tasks, making them easier to manage.

Waterfall project management is a way of approaching projects where you start with the end goal in mind, take small steps toward achieving that goal, and evaluate how well you did as you go along. The idea is that if you do everything right up front (like planning), then things will go smoothly during the rest of the project and it's easier to see where things are going wrong when they do go wrong. This is because the entire project has already been broken down into smaller pieces.

What is Waterfall Project Management?

Waterfall project management is a sequential, linear process that involves completing one phase of a project before moving on to the next. This methodology emphasizes thorough planning, documentation, and a clear understanding of requirements before any work is initiated. The waterfall approach is best suited for projects with well-defined requirements and a stable scope.

The Waterfall Methodology is a popular, linear project management method that uses defined stages for the development and implementation of new projects. It's used to develop software and hardware, products, services, processes, or websites (including mobile apps).

The Waterfall Methodology is also known as the “sequential lifecycle model” or “linear lifecycle model”. It has a clearly defined structure and set of steps. The Waterfall Methodology is often used in software development projects because it helps organize different teams and resources.

Difference Between Waterfall and Agile Project Management

The main difference between waterfall and agile project management is that a waterfall project is done in a single phase, while agile projects are done in multiple phases.

The waterfall method is a single-phase process that is often used in large projects that have many different stakeholders or where deadlines are very important.

In agile project management, each phase has its own set of tasks that need to be completed before moving on to the next one. This makes it easier to see what has been done so far, and it allows stakeholders to provide feedback at any point in the process.

 

Agile Project Management

Waterfall Project Management

Process Type

Multiple phase process

Single phase process

Structure

More flexible, allowing for changes in scope or direction throughout the project

Rigid and structured

Timeline

Requires more time spent on each stage of development

Allows for more control over project timelines and costs

Adaptation

Can adapt to changing circumstances

Cannot adapt to changing circumstances

Focus Area

Focuses on delivering results early

Focuses on breaking down a project into small steps that are completed one at a time.

5 Phases of Waterfall Project Management

The waterfall model is divided into several phases, each of which has specific deliverables and objectives. These phases are:

Step 1:Define requirements.

Step 2:Design the solution

Step 3: Implementation or Build the solution.

Step 4: Test the solution.

Step 5: Deployment and Maintenance.

waterfall-methodology-stages.jpg

Explaining in detail the five common waterfall methodology stages:

1) Define requirements

This phase involves gathering and documenting the requirements of the project through various methods such as interviews, surveys, and workshops. These requirements will serve as the foundation for subsequent phases, ensuring that the project team fully understands the scope and goals of the project. A clear and complete set of requirements is essential for the success of any project.

2) Design the solution

During this phase, the project team develops a detailed design for the project, including system architecture, user interfaces, and database structures. This process involves creating mockups, flowcharts, and diagrams to help visualize the final product. The design phase is crucial for translating the requirements into a functional and efficient solution, taking into account factors such as performance, security, and scalability.

3) Implementation or Build the solution

This phase involves writing the code and creating the software or product based on the design from the previous phase. Developers work closely with the design team to ensure that the final product adheres to the specifications and meets the project's requirements. This phase may also involve integrating the new product with existing systems or technologies.

4) Test the solution and fix bugs (quality assurance)

The project team tests the product to ensure that it meets the requirements and functions as intended. This phase involves various types of testing, such as unit testing, integration testing, and system testing, as well as user acceptance testing to confirm that the product meets the needs of the end-users. Testing is critical for identifying and resolving any bugs or issues before the product is deployed.

5) Deployment & Maintenance

The product is deployed to the end-users or clients, and any necessary training or support is provided. This phase may involve installing the product on the client's systems, configuring settings, and providing documentation or training materials. The deployment phase is essential for ensuring a smooth transition and successful adoption of the product by the users.

The project team addresses any issues or defects that arise after the product has been deployed, ensuring that it continues to function effectively. This phase may involve bug fixes, updates, and enhancements to address evolving user needs or changes in technology. Regular maintenance is crucial for the long-term success and reliability of any software or product.

Pros of Waterfall Methodology

The main benefit of using the waterfall methodology is that they are considered more thorough than other processes because they ensure that all requirements have been met before moving on to subsequent stages in development. Here are some more benefits of the waterfall methodology:

  1. It's easy to understand and use.

  2. It's simple, so it doesn't require much training or education to get started using it.

  3. Teams can work independently on each step without worrying about what other teams are doing or how their work is going to impact another team's work in later steps.

  4. There are no surprises you know exactly what you're getting when you start working on your project. You know exactly what you need to do, so there aren't any surprises along the way (good or bad).

  5. It provides clear accountability if something goes wrong at any point in the process, you'll know exactly who's responsible for fixing it (and they'll have no one else to blame).

  6. Because of its structure, the waterfall methodology can be used by small companies with limited resources and large companies with huge teams of developers working on multiple projects at once.

In a nutshell, waterfall methodology gives you a clear vision of your project's requirements. You know exactly what needs to be done and when it needs to be done. You also have a clear path for how each step can be completed, so there isn't much room for error!

Cons of Waterfall methodology

The Waterfall methodology has many advantages, but it also has some drawbacks.

Waterfall methodologies tend not to be as flexible as other methods and they may take longer than expected due to their strict adherence to procedures

Cons and reasons the waterfall method is falling out of favor:

  1. Doesn't allow for changes in scope or direction during the project (you can't pivot!)

  2. Lacks flexibility, which means that it's not ideal for projects that require multiple iterations or changes in direction

  3. Can be difficult to scale up

  4. Doesn't lend itself well to distributed teams

  5. Can be difficult to estimate and track progress

  6. Doesn't provide a clear path for testing and integration

In a nutshell, waterfall methodology can lead to missed deadlines and unrealistic expectations from leadership teams who are used to seeing projects completed on time every time (this will not always be the case with waterfall methodology).Who uses the waterfall model?

The Waterfall model is used by many companies to manage their software development projects. It's a way of breaking down the phases of a project from conception to completion and making sure that each phase is completed before moving on to the next phase.

This can be useful for companies that need to keep track of their progress and make sure everyone is working towards the same goal.

The Waterfall model works well when you know what your final product will look like before you start building it. The Waterfall model is also good for projects that need to be completed by a deadline.

If you're looking for a simple, straightforward methodology for building software, the Waterfall model is a good choice. It's also one of the most commonly used models in the industry today.

But if you're working on something where there are many unknowns, or if you need to be able to pivot quickly and change direction mid-stream, then this model may not be right for you.

How we can improve the waterfall model?

The waterfall model, a traditional linear approach to software development, has its limitations. However, it can be improved by incorporating certain practices and modifications:

  1. Iterative Approach: Break the project into smaller, manageable iterations and apply the waterfall model to each iteration. This allows for more flexibility and better control over project management.

  2. Feedback Loops: Introduce feedback loops between different phases of the model to allow for better communication and adjustments based on previous phases' results.

  3. Risk Management: Incorporate risk management practices throughout the development process to identify, assess, and mitigate potential risks early in the project lifecycle.

  4. Parallel Development: Allow certain development activities to occur concurrently rather than strictly sequentially. This can help save time and increase efficiency.

  5. Continuous Integration: Implement continuous integration practices to detect integration issues early and minimize rework.

  6. Documentation Improvement: Ensure comprehensive and updated documentation is maintained throughout the project, which helps in better communication among team members and future maintenance efforts.

  7. Customer Involvement: Engage customers or stakeholders regularly to gather feedback on requirements and design decisions, helping to reduce misunderstandings and the need for major changes later in development.

  8. Quality Assurance: Implement quality assurance practices such as testing, code reviews, and performance evaluations at each stage of the development process to ensure high-quality software.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Waterfall project management methodology has its merits and drawbacks. Its structured approach can be beneficial for well-defined projects with clear requirements and stable scope, making it easier for teams to understand and manage their tasks. However, its inflexibility and lack of adaptability can pose challenges in today's fast-paced and ever-changing project landscapes.

To make the most of the Waterfall methodology, consider incorporating improvements such as iterative approaches, feedback loops, and risk management practices to enhance its effectiveness. Ultimately, the choice of project management methodology should be based on the specific needs and constraints of your project, ensuring a streamlined and successful development process.

marketing-8.jpg

FAQ

Who uses the waterfall model?

The Waterfall model is used by many companies to manage their software development projects. It's a way of breaking down the phases of a project from conception to completion and making sure that each phase is completed before moving on to the next phase.

This can be useful for companies that need to keep track of their progress and make sure everyone is working towards the same goal.

The Waterfall model works well when you know what your final product will look like before you start building it. The Waterfall model is also good for projects that need to be completed by a deadline.

If you're looking for a simple, straightforward methodology for building software, the Waterfall model is a good choice. It's also one of the most commonly used models in the industry today.

But if you're working on something where there are many unknowns, or if you need to be able to pivot quickly and change direction mid-stream, then this model may not be right for you.

Why waterfall methodology doesn't work?

In essence, the waterfall methodology offers a well-defined roadmap for a project, outlining the specific tasks and deadlines that need to be met. This clarity can be beneficial in certain situations, but it also comes with its own set of drawbacks. Here are the reasons why waterfall methodology doesn't work:

  • The waterfall methodology is not friendly to change.

  • Responsibilities are sequential and isolated.

  • Deadlines are a moving target.

  • There's an inherent lack of communication between project team members.

  • It's not flexible enough to reflect changes in schedule, scope, or requirements during the project.

When to use the waterfall model?

The Waterfall Model is used when you need to complete a project in stages, and you want to make sure that each stage is completed before moving on to the next one. The Waterfall Model is also called the "linear" or "sequential" model because it follows a linear path from beginning to end.

This model works well when you have a large project with several stages, each of which has its own set of tasks and deadlines. It's also good for projects with many different stakeholders who will be involved throughout the process. This model can help keep everyone on track with their responsibilities and ensure that no one misses any steps along the way.

However, this method may not be ideal for everyone or every project! Because there are no opportunities for feedback during each stage of development (except at the very end), it can make people feel like they're not contributing until everything is finished and that might not be until after they've already left their job!

What are some examples of a waterfall model project?

The waterfall model is known for its linear progress and rigid scheduling, which makes it great for projects that have a clear start and end (like developing a website). But it can also be used in situations where you need to follow a set order of tasks to reach your goal.

Let's take a look at some examples of how this could be applied in practice:

Developing an app or website:

Requirements Gathering: In this stage, you would gather all of the requirements for your project from stakeholders and team members. This could include things like a needs assessment or market research. If you have multiple stakeholders involved in your project then this stage may end up being iterative where each stakeholder gives feedback about their needs before moving on to the next phase.

Designing: In this phase, you would create functional specifications based on what was gathered in the previous phase(s). This would include creating user stories for each feature or requirement that was identified during requirements gathering. If there were any changes made from one iteration to another then those changes would also be reflected here (for example if an idea was added or removed).

Coding: In this phase, developers will code the software based on the functional specifications that were created in the previous phase.

Testing: Once the code has been written, it needs to be tested for bugs and functionality. This can be done by both developers and non-developers alike as long as they have been trained on how to test (which should be done before beginning this stage).

Why companies do not want to move away from the waterfall method?

There are many reasons why companies do not want to move away from the waterfall methodology. One of the most common reasons is that it is easier for them to understand and implement.

Another reason is that it provides a structure for most projects which can help with planning and managing time. However, there are also several disadvantages to using this project management method.

The main disadvantage is that changes cannot be made easier once the project has started because all work must be done in one go at the end of each phase, rather than being able to make changes along the way as issues arise (e.g., if there is an issue with one feature then it cannot be changed).

Get started with Supahub
Free trial Get started with Supahub Sign up now

More Posts

Get started with Supahub for free

Stop wasting time & start collecting user feedback

Keep track of feature requests and understand which feedbacks carry the most impact and should be prioritized.

Arrow
No credit card required
Arrow
14-day free trial
Marketing banner for Supahub which is a popular customer feedback tool.